Exercise shipwreck. Business game "shipwreck"

Castaways Purpose: The exercise is used to explore the group's decision-making process; teaches effective behavior to achieve agreement when solving a group problem; provides information regarding patterns of communication, leadership, and dominance in a group and can contribute to the cohesion of group members (Pfeiffor & Jones, 1975, p). Time required: 1.5 hours. Materials: Copies of instructions, large sheets of paper and pencils. Preparation: The leader must have skills in group process research. Procedure: Each group member is given the following instructions and asked to complete the task within 15 minutes.


Castaways You are adrift on a yacht in the southern part Pacific Ocean. As a result of a fire on board most of the yacht and its cargo were destroyed. The yacht is slowly sinking. Your location is unclear due to the failure of your primary navigational instruments, but you are approximately a thousand miles southwest of the nearest land.


When people interact in difficult conditions joint activities there is a need to move from individual thinking to group thinking. Comparison of the results of group and individual thinking is not always in favor of group thinking, although it would seem that an increase in the amount of mental effort should lead to a corresponding increase. Available experimental results have shown that different shapes intellectual activity, especially complex ones, deteriorate even in cases of the simple presence of other people. Obviously, socio-psychological laws such as conformism, adaptation to the standards accepted in the group, and a decrease in the individual contribution of each person begin to operate in groups. overall result activity with increasing group size (Ringelmann's law). However, collective mental actions are a reality, and with a free discussion of the results, the absence of fear of punishment and tension, the equal status of all participants in the discussion, it is possible not only to increase group results compared to individual ones (remember the Russian proverb A good mind, but two are better), but also the formulation of new hypotheses and principles for solving various problems. The brainstorming method is based on meeting precisely these conditions, and it is actively used in modern business technologies. In the proposed Shipwreck technique (Kjell Rudestam, 1994), subjects must evaluate the advantages of individual or group thinking when solving the same problem and analyze their own behavior, for example, the degree of activity in defending their point of view, emotional reactions, speed of solution.



Below is a list of 15 items that remained intact and undamaged after the fire. In addition to these items, you have a durable inflatable life raft with oars large enough to support you, the crew, and all of the items listed below. The survivors' possessions consist of a pack of cigarettes, several boxes of matches, and five one-dollar bills... Your task is to classify the 15 items listed below according to their survival value. Place number 1 on the most important item, number 2 on the second most important item, and so on until the fifteenth item is least important to you.


Sextant Shaving mirror Canister of water Mosquito net One box of army rations Map of the Pacific Ocean. Inflatable cushion (floatation device). Two-gallon (approx. 9 liters) canister of oil and gas mixture. Small transistor radio Shark repellent Twenty square meters of opaque plastic One bottle of 80 proof rum. Fifteen meters of nylon rope Two boxes of chocolate Fishing net


Once the individual classification is completed, the group is given 45 minutes to complete the overall task. This is a group decision making exercise. Your group, guided by the principle of reaching consensus when making joint decision, must reach a consensus on the place in the classification of each of the fifteen items before it becomes part of the group decision. Consensus is difficult to achieve, so not every assessment will receive the full approval of all participants. The group tries to give each assessment in such a way that all group members can agree with it at least in part. Use the following guidelines to reach agreement:


1. Avoid defending your individual judgments. Approach the task logically. 2. Avoid changing your mind just to achieve agreement; do not try to avoid conflict. Only support decisions with which you can at least partially agree. 3. Avoid such methods of “conflict reduction” as voting, compromise decisions in order to achieve agreement when solving a group problem. 4. View differences of opinion as a help, not a hindrance, when making decisions.


According to experts, the main things a person needs when shipwrecked on the ocean are items to attract attention and items to help one survive until rescuers arrive. Navigational aids have relatively small matter: Even if a small life raft is able to reach land, it is impossible to store enough food and water on it to survive during this period. Therefore, the most important ones are a shaving mirror and a canister of oil and gas mixture. These items can be used to alert air and sea rescuers. The second most important things are things like a canister of water and a box of army rations.














7. Fishing tackle. Rated lower than chocolate, because in this situation “a bird in the hand is better than a pie in the sky.” There is no guarantee that you will catch a fish.














When comparing these lists with the correct control answers, each subject determines the degree of his erroneous actions. To do this, the difference between the item number on the individual or group list and the checklist number is calculated. How more difference, the greater the cost of error. For example, if a subject puts the number 5 for the maps of the Pacific Ocean, considering them quite necessary, but on the checklist they are numbered 13, the cost of the error is 13-5 = 8 points. It is also calculated total amount points for both lists. If the sum is more than 60 points, the subjects are in danger of unsuccessful swimming.


Each subject evaluates the advantage of individual or group thinking, as well as, using the method of introspection, his behavior during the discussion. What behaviors helped or hindered the consensus process? What leadership patterns emerged? Who participated and who didn't? Who were the influences? Why? What was the atmosphere in the group during the discussion? Were the team's capabilities optimally used? What actions did the group members take to “pull through” their opinions? How to improve group decision making? Alternatively, one or more observers who do not participate in the group process can provide after the task is completed feedback about group or individual behavior.

Target: study the process of developing and making a group decision during communication and group discussion.

Carrying out the game

1st stage.

Familiarization of all participants with the terms of the game:

The facilitator gives the participants the following instructions: “Imagine you are drifting on a yacht in the South Pacific Ocean. As a result of the fire, most of the yacht and its cargo were destroyed. The yacht is slowly sinking. Your location is unclear due to the failure of the main navigation instruments, but you are approximately a thousand kilometers from the nearest land."

Below is a list of 15 items that remained intact and undamaged as a result of the fire. In addition to these items, you have a durable inflatable raft with oars large enough to support you, your crew, and all of the items listed below. The property of the survivors consists of a pack of cigarettes, several boxes of matches and 5 one-dollar bills. List of items:

Sectarian.

Shaving mirror.

Canister with 25 liters of water.

Mosquito net.

One box of army rations.

Maps of the Pacific Ocean.

Inflatable swimming pillow.

Canister with 10 liters of oil and gas mixture.

Small transistor radio.

Repellent that repels sharks.

Two square meters opaque film.

One liter of rum with 80% strength.

450 meters of nylon rope.

Two boxes of chocolate.

Fishing tackle.

2nd stage.

Ask each of the participants to independently rank the items listed in the application in terms of their importance for survival (put number 1 for the most important item for you, number 2 for the second most important, etc., number 15 will correspond to the least useful item) .

At this stage of the business game, discussions between participants are prohibited. Note the average individual time to complete the task.

3rd stage.

Divide the group into subgroups of about 6 people. Ask one participant from each subgroup to be the expert.

Invite each subgroup to create a group-wide ranking of items according to their degree of importance (as they did this separately).

At this stage, discussions regarding the development of a solution are allowed.

Note the average time to complete the task for each subgroup.

4th stage.

In each subgroup, a leader is selected who will defend the opinion of the group. An expert is selected for the leadership group. Leaders from subgroups are invited to the center of the circle and rank items in order of importance. Leaders discuss their decisions. There should be no hints from other players.



A). Listen to the experts' opinions about the course of the discussion and how the group decision was made, initial versions, the use of compelling reasons, arguments, etc. How actively and convincingly the leaders defended and defended the interests of their subgroup.

B). Read the “correct” list of answers proposed by UNESCO experts:

According to experts, the main things a person needs when shipwrecked on the ocean are items that serve to attract attention and items that help them survive until rescuers arrive. Navigation aids are of comparatively little importance: even if a small life raft is able to reach land, it is impossible to store enough water and food on it to survive during this period.

Therefore, the most important things for you are a shaving mirror and a canister of oil and gas mixture. These items can be used to alert air and sea rescuers.

The second most important things are things like a canister of water and a box of army rations.

The information given below obviously does not list everything possible ways application of a given item, but rather indicates what significance the given item has for survival.

Shaving mirror. Important for signaling to air and sea rescuers.

Canister with oil and gas mixture. Important for signaling. Can be lit with a banknote and a match and will float on the water, attracting attention.

Canister with water. Necessary to quench thirst.

Box with army rations. Provides basic food.

Opaque film. Used to collect rainwater and provide protection from bad weather.

Box of chocolate. Reserve food supply.



Fishing tackle. It is rated lower than chocolate, because in this situation a bird in the hand is better than a pie in the sky. There is no guarantee that you will catch a fish.

Nylon rope. Can be used to tie up equipment to prevent it from falling overboard.

Swimming pillow. A life-saving device in case someone falls overboard.

Repellent that repels sharks. The purpose is obvious.

Rum, 80% ABV. Contains 80% alcohol - enough to be used as an antiseptic, but otherwise of little value as consumption may cause dehydration.

Radio. Has little value since there is no transmitter.

Maps of the Pacific Ocean. Useless without additional navigation devices. It is more important for you to know not where you are, but where the rescuers are.

Mosquito net. There are no mosquitoes in the Pacific Ocean.

Sectarian. Without tables and a chronometer it is relatively useless. The main reason for the higher rating of signaling devices compared to life-sustaining items (food and water) is that without signaling devices there is almost no chance of being detected and rescued. Moreover, in most cases, rescuers arrive within the first 36 hours, and a person can live this period without food or water.

Questions:

1. Was it difficult for you to rank items?

2. Was it difficult to rank them as a group?

3. Did you have any difficulties assigning ranks to items?

4. Was it easy to convince the other guys?

Trainings. Psychocorrectional programs. Business games Team of authors

Business game"Shipwrecked"

Explanatory note

The business game “Shipwrecked” is intended for mastering and understanding instrumental tasks associated with building real activities, achieving a specific goal, and structuring a system business relations with other people.

This game allows you to develop goal-setting and activity planning skills; develop internal flexibility in developing and changing action plans; develop self-regulation skills in the process of achieving goals; develop social and personal criticism, the ability to relate one’s activities to the activities of other people.

Target:“Castwrecked”: explore the process of developing and making a group decision through communication and group discussion.

Time spending: about 1 hour.

Carrying out the game

1st stage.

Familiarization of all participants with the terms of the game:

The facilitator gives the participants the following instructions: “Imagine you are drifting on a yacht in the South Pacific Ocean. As a result of the fire, most of the yacht and its cargo were destroyed. The yacht is slowly sinking. Your location is unclear due to the failure of the main navigation instruments, but you are approximately a thousand kilometers from the nearest land."

Below is a list of 15 items that remained intact and undamaged as a result of the fire. In addition to these items, you have a durable inflatable raft with oars large enough to support you, your crew, and all of the items listed below. The property of the survivors consists of a pack of cigarettes, several boxes of matches and 5 one-dollar bills. List of items:

Sectarian.

Shaving mirror.

Canister with 25 liters of water.

Mosquito net.

One box of army rations.

Maps of the Pacific Ocean.

Inflatable swimming pillow.

Canister with 10 liters of oil and gas mixture.

Small transistor radio.

Repellent that repels sharks.

Two square meters of opaque film.

One liter of rum with 80% strength.

450 meters of nylon rope.

Two boxes of chocolate.

Fishing tackle.

2nd stage.

Ask each of the participants to independently rank the items listed in the application in terms of their importance for survival (put number 1 for the most important item for you, number 2 for the second most important, etc., number 15 will correspond to the least useful item) .

At this stage of the business game, discussions between participants are prohibited. Note the average individual time to complete the task.

3rd stage.

Divide the group into subgroups of about 6 people. Ask one participant from each subgroup to be the expert.

Invite each subgroup to create a group-wide ranking of items according to their degree of importance (as they did this separately).

At this stage, discussions regarding the development of a solution are allowed.

Note the average time to complete the task for each subgroup.

4th stage.

In each subgroup, a leader is selected who will defend the opinion of the group. An expert is selected for the leadership group. Leaders from subgroups are invited to the center of the circle and rank items in order of importance. Leaders discuss their decisions. There should be no hints from other players.

A). Listen to the experts' opinions about the course of the discussion and how the group decision was made, initial versions, the use of compelling reasons, arguments, etc. How actively and convincingly the leaders defended and defended the interests of their subgroup.

B). Read the “correct” list of answers proposed by UNESCO experts:

According to experts, the main things a person needs when shipwrecked on the ocean are items that serve to attract attention and items that help them survive until rescuers arrive. Navigation aids are of comparatively little importance: even if a small life raft is able to reach land, it is impossible to store enough water and food on it to survive during this period.

Therefore, the most important things for you are a shaving mirror and a canister of oil and gas mixture. These items can be used to alert air and sea rescuers.

The second most important things are things like a canister of water and a box of army rations.

The information given below obviously does not list all the possible uses of a given item, but rather indicates how important the item is for survival.

Shaving mirror. Important for signaling to air and sea rescuers.

Canister with oil and gas mixture. Important for signaling. Can be lit with a banknote and a match and will float on the water, attracting attention.

Canister with water. Necessary to quench thirst.

Box with army rations. Provides basic food.

Opaque film. Used to collect rainwater and provide protection from bad weather.

Box of chocolate. Reserve food supply.

Fishing tackle. It is rated lower than chocolate, because in this situation a bird in the hand is better than a pie in the sky. There is no guarantee that you will catch a fish.

Nylon rope. Can be used to tie up equipment to prevent it from falling overboard.

Swimming pillow. A life-saving device in case someone falls overboard.

Repellent that repels sharks. The purpose is obvious.

Rum, 80% ABV. Contains 80% alcohol - enough to be used as an antiseptic, but otherwise of little value as consumption may cause dehydration.

Radio. Has little value since there is no transmitter.

Maps of the Pacific Ocean. Useless without additional navigation devices. It is more important for you to know not where you are, but where the rescuers are.

Mosquito net. There are no mosquitoes in the Pacific Ocean.

Sectarian. Without tables and a chronometer it is relatively useless. The main reason for the higher rating of signaling devices compared to

life-sustaining items (food and water) is that without alarm systems there is almost no chance of being detected and rescued. Moreover, in most cases, rescuers arrive within the first 36 hours, and a person can live this period without food or water.

Offer to compare the “correct” answer, your own result and the group’s result: for each item on the list, you need to calculate the difference between the number that each participant, group assigned to it individually and the number assigned to this item by experts. Add up the absolute values ​​of these differences for all items. If the amount is more than 30, then the participant or group “drowned”; IN). Compare the results of the group and individual solutions. Was the result of the group decision more correct than the decision of the individual participants?

Comments on the event:

This game makes it possible to quantify the effectiveness of a group decision.

In a group, a greater number of solution options arise and best quality than those working alone.

Solving a problem in a group setting usually takes longer than solving the same problems by an individual.

Decisions made through group discussion tend to be riskier than individual decisions.

An individual who has special skills (abilities, knowledge, information) related to a group task is usually more active in the group and makes a greater contribution to the development of group decisions.

From the book Workshop on Conflict Management author Emelyanov Stanislav Mikhailovich

Lesson 2.2. Topic: “The essence of the conflict and its causes.” Business game “Complaint” Purpose of the game. Developing students’ ability to analyze conflict based on their understanding of basic conflictological concepts; developing skills in using the simplest methods of study and assessment

From book Practical psychology for manager author Altshuller A A

Lesson 10.2. Business game “Conflict situation in a complex construction team” Purpose of the game. To familiarize students with socio-psychological studies of conflicts that arise in labor collectives and small formal and informal groups, highlight the reasons

From the book The Naked Truth about Women author Sklyar Sasha

Lesson 12.2. Topic: “Conflicts in the organization.” Business game “Reforming the organization” Purpose of the game. Developing students' skills in analyzing conflicts in an organization and developing their skills to conduct a business discussion on controversial issues. Game situation. Introduction of new

From the book How to Maintain Success. The art of communication. Technologies, illusions, possibilities author Tsvetkova Evgenia Gennadievna

Lesson 12.3. Business game “Conflict at an industrial enterprise” Purpose of the game. Introduce students to conflict situations, arising on industrial enterprises during their reconstruction, teach to recognize the causes and types of conflicts, as well as find

From the book Communicating with Ease [How to Find mutual language with any person] by Ridler Bill

Lesson 13.2. Business game “Marital conflict” Purpose of the game. Introduce students to one of the options for marital conflicts, determine their types and try to find possible options solutions to marital conflicts of this type. Game participants: 1. Husband is a worker

From the book I Am a Woman author Sheremeteva Galina Borisovna

Lesson 13.3. Business game “Socially mature family” Purpose of the game. To familiarize participants with the structure of a rational family consumer budget, consolidate skills in income distribution, and balance income and expenses; develop the ability to discuss collectively

From the book Trainings. Psychocorrectional programs. Business games author Team of authors

Lesson 15.2. Topic: “Global and regional conflicts.” Business game “International coordination” Purpose of the game. Show participants the relationship between industrial production and the level of well-being of the population and the state of environment; consolidate teamwork skills

From the author's book

From the author's book

5. Business It is believed that 10–15% of men and women in the population tend to transform their roles. So, businessmen among modern Russian women– 16%. She has little idea why men are needed. She herself is a man by nature. And since he’s a man, that means

From the author's book

Business game “LEADER” Imagine that in your team all the formalities that bind people have disappeared overnight. There are no longer bosses and subordinates among you. No one owes anyone anything, no one is obliged. Nobody can order anything. Any member of the group can leave and

From the author's book

Business trip "Sufferer". When he asks for something, he constructs phrases in such a way as to make the interlocutor feel guilty, hoping that he will understand how much he has to sacrifice and give what he needs. Then the “sufferer” will not have to directly ask for something. It's difficult for him

From the author's book

Business woman Modern life, when a woman can earn money and provide for herself, has created this stereotype of a woman. They do not hope for help and provision from a man, like representatives of some other stereotypes of female behavior. These women got into the ring and

From the author's book

Business economic game “Let’s go to Goa” Explanatory note for business participants economic game It is proposed to organize travel agencies to attract tourists to the island of Goa. During play activity participants get acquainted with history and culture

Purpose of the game: study the process of developing and making decisions during communication and group discussion.

Time spending: -

Order of conduct.

1. Familiarize all participants with the conditions of the game (Appendix A);

2. Each player independently ranks the indicated items in terms of their importance for survival (number 1 is for the most important item for you, number 2 is for the second most important, number 15 will correspond to the least useful item). At this stage, discussions between participants are prohibited,

3. Divide the group into subgroups of 6 people. One participant from each subgroup must be an expert. You can invite each subgroup to create a group-wide ranking of items according to their degree of importance (just as they did separately). At this stage, discussion about developing a solution is allowed. Note the average time to complete the task in each subgroup.

4. Evaluate the results of the discussion in each subgroup. For this:

a) listen to the opinions of experts on the course of the Discussion and how the group decision was made, what were the initial versions, compelling reasons, arguments, etc.;

b) read out the “correct” list of answers proposed by UNESCO experts; compare the “correct” answer, your own result and the result of the group: for each item on the list, you need to calculate the difference between the number assigned to it individually by each participant, group, and the number assigned to this item by experts; add up the absolute values ​​of these differences for all objects; if the amount is more than 30, then the participant or subgroup “drowned.”

c) compare the results of group and individual decisions; determine whether the result of a group decision was more correct than the decision of individuals.

Comments on the game:

    this exercise provides an opportunity to quantify the effectiveness of a group decision;

    in a group, a larger number of solution options arise and of better quality than those who decide alone;

    solving problems in a group setting usually takes longer than solving the same problems by an individual;

    decisions made as a result of group discussion are more risky than individual decisions;

    an individual who has special skills (abilities, knowledge, information) related to a group task is usually more active in the group and makes a greater contribution to the development of a group solution.

Imagine that you are drifting on a yacht in the South Pacific Ocean. As a result of the fire, most of the yacht and its cargo were destroyed. The yacht is slowly sinking. Your location is unclear due to the failure of the main navigation instruments, but you are approximately a thousand kilometers away from the nearest land.

The following is a list of 15 items that remained intact after the fire. In addition to these items, you have a durable inflatable raft with oars, large enough to support you, your crew, and all of these items. The property of the remaining living people is several boxes of matches and five one-dollar bills.

  1. Shaving mirror.

    Canister with 25 liters of water.

    Mosquito net.

    One box of army rations.

    Map of the Pacific Ocean.

    Inflatable swimming pillow.

    Canister with 10 liters of oil and gas mixture.

    Small transistor radio.

    Repellent that repels sharks.

    Two square meters of opaque film.

    One liter of rum 80% ABV.

    450 meters of nylon rope.

    Two boxes of chocolate;

    Fishing tackle.

Answers from UNESCO experts for the game "Shipwrecked".

According to experts, the main things a person needs when they are shipwrecked in the ocean are items that will help them survive until rescuers arrive. Navigation aids are of comparatively little importance: even if a small life raft is able to reach land, it is impossible to carry enough water or food for life during this period. Therefore, the most important things for you are a shaving mirror and a canister of oil and gas mixture. These items can be used to alert air and sea rescuers. The second most important things are things like a canister of water and a box of army rations.

    Shaving mirror - for signaling air and sea rescuers.

    A canister with an oil and gas mixture - for signaling. Can be lit with a banknote and a match. It will float on the water, attracting attention.

    A canister of water - to quench your thirst.

    Army ration box - will provide basic food.

    Opaque film - for collecting rainwater and for protection from bad weather.

    A box of chocolate is a reserve food supply.

    Fishing tackle is rated lower than chocolate, because in this situation a “bird” in the hands is better than a “crane” in the sky. There is no certainty that you will catch a fish.

    Nylon rope - for tying down equipment to prevent it from falling overboard.

    A flotation cushion is a life-saving device in case someone falls overboard.

    A repellent that repels sharks - the purpose is obvious.

    Rum 80% ABV - contains enough alcohol to be used as an antiseptic; in other cases it is of little value because its consumption can cause dehydration.

    Radio receiver - has little value, since there is no transmitter.

    A map of the Pacific Ocean is useless without additional navigational aids.

    It is more important for you to know not where you are, but where the rescuers are.

    Mosquito net - there are no mosquitoes in the Pacific Ocean.

Cultist - without tables and a chronometer, relatively useless.

The main reason for the higher rating of signaling devices compared to life-sustaining items (food and water) is that without signaling devices there is almost no chance of being detected and rescued." Moreover, in most cases, rescuers arrive within the first thirty-six hours, and the person can survive this period without food or water.

BUSINESS GAME “SHIPWRECKED”

Surviving items

Personal ranking

Difference between personal ranking and group ranking

(between numbers 2 and 3 columns)

Ranking of experts

Difference between personal ranking and expert ranking

(between numbers 2 and 5 of column)

Difference between group and expert rankings

(between numbers 3 and 5 of column)

Sectant - a tool for measuring the height of a star above the horizon in order to determine the coordinates of a ship

Shaving mirror

Canister with 25 liters of water

Mosquito net

One box of army rations

Pacific Ocean Map

Inflatable swimming pillow

Canister with 10 liters of combustible mixture

Small transistor radio

Shark repellent

Two square meters of opaque film

One liter of rum 80% strength

450 meters of nylon rope

Two boxes of chocolate

Fishing tackle

psychological exercises for training

business games, exercises:

Exercise "Shipwreck"

Participants must fit on a small “raft” left after the “shipwreck”. The space of the raft does not allow all members of the group to stand freely, so a group decision and close contact are necessary.


25.12.2009
Max
There is also this exercise:
You are in the middle of the ocean on a ship that is slowly sinking. Radio communication is not working. All passengers had already taken their seats on the lifeboats; there was only one free boat left. In order to get to the shore safely, you cannot exceed the load of this boat - it only has room for provisions and 6 people.

Left on the ship:
(m – man, f – woman)
Dietitian (w)
Politician (m)
Olympic rower with a broken arm (m)
Expert linguist (w)
Pregnant woman (f)
Geography teacher (w)
Yachtman – amateur (w)
Retired General (m)
Policeman (m)
First class chef (m)
Scout Leader (m)
Gymnast (w)
Lawyer (m)
Electrician (m)
Mechanic (m)
Retired nurse (f)

For 40 minutes, discuss in groups which of the people listed above should be taken on the rescue boat. Don't forget that there are only 6 seats on the boat!"

This projective test, one of his versions. The original version was from German psychiatrists in Nazi Germany. This is the American version.

Keys:
1. Saving a nutritionist - those who vote for do not perceive stressful situations seriously, prone to psychosomatics, concerned about health and procreation.
2. Saving the politician - for: formalists, image- and career-oriented.
3. Saving the champion - for: those who are oriented towards the past, not interested in development, are offended if their past achievements are not taken into account, etc. etc.


15.01.2010
Irina
Please add the key to the game, without decoding it makes no sense ((((
15.01.2010
cloud
Irina, here it is
15.01.2010
bagel
Or maybe someone can tell me the key to this particular game? Much needed!
27.02.2010
Valentina
Cool game, I would add one rule to it, so that one of the participants, chosen by the group, would serve as a captain, who would approve the candidacies of those who will board the boat, i.e. the group discusses, nominates candidates, and the captain approves.
12.03.2010
Alina
Maxim, please write full key to the test. Or give me a link. Thank you
19.03.2010
Anna
Max, I agree with Alina and Irina’s request.
23.03.2010
Victor
Maxim, we are already asking you everything. Give me the key.....)), plz.
28.03.2010
Victoria
Maxim, please give me the full key
27.05.2010
Well, Maxim
16.06.2010
Elena
Yes, everything is obvious there, gentlemen! Or are you not psychologists?
17.09.2010
if she’s so smart, write, people ask and not all psychologists come to this site
18.09.2010
professor of psychology
Elena
don't be smart

17.10.2010
Alyona
In fact, this exercise is more aimed at interaction within the group, it does not matter who they ultimately choose, as long as it is common decision, plus a logical explanation for the action. As a result, it will be possible to identify the leader, the hidden leader, the outcast (there is not always one) and the middle part of the group.
09.11.2010
pipka
good game, but I would like a more detailed legend
09.11.2010
specific hamster
I like it...
10.11.2010
Marusya
Max! Thank you. The game is interesting. You can take it as a basis and make your own.
17.02.2011
Anna
Ladies and Gentlemen! Since Maxim is silent, maybe someone experienced can share his thoughts about the key? Or let's brainstorm :)
19.02.2011
Dear colleagues, I conducted this game, but diversified it a little, each member in the group was given a specific role from the list of professions, the task was as follows: make a list of 6 people who will be able to survive in the future, and on the other hand, everyone must convince everyone that it is you who should be in the boat, since you are the most useful of all. It is very exciting, then you analyze how a team is spontaneously formed, first leaders appear, then they change, observe the group dynamics, in the end we came to the conclusion that we need to leave those most capable of surviving in wild conditions, namely: scout leader, nutritionist (doctor after all), policeman, etc. A pregnant woman is left behind, paradoxically. Usually the participants really like this game.
30.10.2011
if you wrote the word like without soft sign, I would listen...
08.01.2012
smacks of amateur performances..Where are the psychologists??
19.01.2012
Psychologist
Yo-yo-yo! I read it. Nothing particularly new. Teachers are playing with psychology again! The desire to “wind up your own” is especially dangerous. What pleased me most were the “improvements” regarding the distribution of roles and the appointment of a captain. About this effect, when the first thing they do is kill losers/outcasts in real life during the game of "Mafia", despite their status in the game, did not you hear? Horror!!!
Nobody talks about being doomed to die. Nobody talks about a pragmatic approach to a person’s personality. It was the norm in Nazi Germany when people were assessed by the shape of their skull, but here by profession and gender. No difference. In short, learning to make decisions based on stereotypes. What kind of personality development can we talk about here? This is not development, but a search for profit. Complete degradation!!! This game is for manipulators. How to use people to get maximum benefit.
And most of them shout like in the “Kingdom of Crooked Mirrors” “The key! Give me the key!!!”
There are many games for common name"Catastrophe", where the group is asked to choose (rank) things. There, indeed, there is learning to interact, make decisions, defend your position, search for compromises... And the key is not important there! Because For different groups exist different ways survival. The process of interaction and joint decision-making is important. This is the skill that is being developed.
And for those who liked it, I want to remind you that the Chinese love to eat rotten eggs, there are more than 1 billion Chinese people. Rotten eggs delicious?)))

23.06.2012
Psychologist-1
horror! For such games with children, you should be deprived of your diploma
18.07.2012
Artyom
I hope my post will be useful to someone.

Firstly, there is no team interaction here and cannot be.
secondly, the given “key” is also meaningless.
and for children this is clearly not the topic.

The task is that everyone individually chooses who to fill the boat with, and then the presenter talks and everyone draws conclusions for themselves.
This is a test that has correct answers. the correct answers are selected by effective top managers (who give similar answers)

So, “there is only room on it for provisions and 6 people.”
The first question the presenter asks is: did you take yourself into the boat - do you remember about yourself, or is your life completely unimportant to you?
more important point- whether you take other leaders into your team, or you yourself are a leader and take performers.

Dietitian (f) - he is of absolutely no use. some take it for some reason. refuse

The politician (m) is a completely useless person, a chatterbox and nothing else, and he probably likes to give orders. refuse

For some reason, an Olympic rower with a broken arm (m) is criticized for his take. however, we take it, because a person is focused on winning (otherwise you won’t become an Olympian) and even with one hand he will probably rake much more (1)

Expert Linguist (f) - Someone takes him in the hope that he will be able to talk to the natives. but there’s really no point in it. refuse

Pregnant woman (f) - almost everyone takes it out of pity or “there are two of them.” but whoever will give birth in the ocean, she most likely does not have the strength to work to save the team; on the contrary, the whole team will have to take care of her, so it’s a refusal.

A geography teacher (f) is, firstly, a person who likes to command, and secondly, knowledge of geography in such conditions is of little benefit, especially since this is f. refusal,

Yachtman - amateur (f) - even if, but it’s hard to be a yachtsman with a weak will, especially since yachtsmen also understand navigation and how to survive in ocean conditions, so we take (2)


18.07.2012
Artyom
Retired general (m) - old man, cannot row. likes to command (again - who is the leader, “I” or others). refusal

The policeman (m) is not our police, this is America. therefore: a person is physically hardy - he can row. executive (used to following orders). knows the basics of medicine - is able to provide primary care. so let's take (3)

First class cook (m) - wonderful. We'll gorge ourselves on delicacies in the middle of the ocean. refusal.

Scout leader (m) - likes to command, otherwise no use. We provided medicine to the police, geography - to the yachtsman, so it’s a refusal.

Gymnast (female) - physically resilient. take (4)

Lawyer (m) - nothing more, nothing more, refusal

An electrician (m), a mechanic (m) are most likely physically resilient and do not talk, but do. We take anyone (because there are not enough places) (5)

Retired nurse (f) - some take her in company with a pregnant woman (to attend childbirth), others simply to provide primary care. but in reality, the police provide medical care, and she can’t row, so it’s a refusal.


23.09.2012
legofox
I performed this exercise twice in the same group. First, listeners were asked to come up with a profession that they would like to be in their dreams and write it down on a card so that others would not see. Then, based on professions, the task was set - to leave only 6 people on the raft. The discussion in the group was logical and only the necessary professions were left.
The second time the same situation was played openly, that is, everyone represented their profession and argued that they should take it.
The goal of the game was to show how our personal opinions about people influence decision making. (for example, in a team of 8 people there was one woman who was a florist. The first time she was immediately thrown out, but she was left in the second time - since she was the only woman)

13.12.2012
Elena
You can play this game in different ways. For example, a disaster is not in the ocean, but the end of the world (relevant)), you can hide in a bunker with supplies of air, food, etc., but only for a few people (no more than half of the group, for example, if there are 13 people in a group, then there are places of safety - 6). At the beginning of the game, the coach attaches signs to the participants with the name social roles(you can take not the same ones as in the example above, but your own, based on your goals. For example, I used the following in a lesson on tolerance with teenagers: a military man, a drug addict, a pregnant woman, an old man, a strong guy (infected with HIV), a cook, a scientist, homeless person, electrician, driver, nurse, psychologist, released criminal (imprisoned for murder), mechanic, student, bandit, participants should not see their signs, and other participants should not directly name them (At the end of the game, they can say - they guessed or. no about your social role)
First, there is a discussion about who to take (the condition with teenagers is that you yourself are definitely ending up in a bunker). At the end of the game the most interesting and instructive, it all depends on the coach. Suggests questions: what criteria did you use to select people? Has anyone thought about what personal characteristics candidates for salvation? and so on. The conclusion is that, unfortunately, very often in modern society There is a question about using people for profit, about intolerance towards people of socially vulnerable categories, and so on.

03.12.2013
I used this game in an elective class for career guidance in the 10th and 11th grades. All (all!) my children immediately put a pregnant woman on the boat. To my provocative question: “Why take it?” (in group No. 4 I could no longer stand it and began to what is called blather) I received the answer: “Well, we are people!” She burst into tears and turned to the window (the teachers were crying and swearing because of these children), in group 5 they answered: “So we’ll save both of them right away.” In gr. 6 - “there is a meaning for salvation, not only for one’s own sake, but also somehow noble.” May God give all the best to my children. BUT! They didn’t hire a lawyer, a politician, a teacher, an economist (instead of a gymnast), a nutritionist, or a linguist. When I asked: “Why then choose these professions for yourself?” there was deathly silence.
10.11.2016
Maksim
Choose these professions? Are you joking? What did the children learn?
11.04.2017
Nastya
teachers would give a damn too
04.10.2018
Azamat Shikhaev
Artyom, of course, you described everything here so beautifully in your answer. In my opinion, with such selfish thinking you won’t go anywhere and there’s no question of what kind of command, you not only won’t be able to command it, you’ll assemble it and you won’t be able to teach Sema, maybe yours the answer came to someone but didn’t insert it at all, so reconsider your thinking leader commander)))